Legal Opinion
Erwin-Simpson v. Air Asia Berhard
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 22, 2019No. Civil Action No. 2018-0083Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MARY ERWIN-SIMPSON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 18-cv-00083 (CRC) AIRASIA BERHAD, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Mary Erwin-Simpson alleges that she was injured on a flight from Kuala Lumpur to Phnom Penh operated by the Malaysia-based airline AirAsia Berhad (“AirAsia”). Erwin- Simpson and her husband have sued AirAsia and its affiliate, AirAsia X Berhad (“AirAsia X”), pursuant to the Montreal Convention, a multilateral treaty governing liability for injury suffered in international air travel. Each airline moves to dismiss…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Dolly Kyle Browning and Direct Outstanding Creations Corporation v. William Jefferson ClintonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Jerome Stevens Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Food & Drug AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.