Legal Opinion

Higgins v. Gillesheiner

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided May 15, 1875PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Argued on bill.

1Opinion of the Court

The Vice-Chancellor.

The complainant in this case is the receiver appointed by a Justice of the Supreme Court, at the instance of a judgment creditor, under the act to prevent fraudulent trusts and assignments. Nix. Big. 297. The object of the bill is to annul certain conveyances of land alleged to have been made in fraud of creditors. It alleges the contraction of a debt by the defendant, Jacob Gillesheiner, to George M. Ryerson, on the 15th of October, 1873, the recovery of a judgment therefor by Ryerson in the Supreme Court, December 29th, 1874, the issuing and return of execution…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wilson v. WilsonNew York Court of Chancery · 1846

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Duttkin v. ZalenskiNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1945
  2. Duttkin v. ZalenskiNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API