Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Allen v. Allen

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided April 15, 1994No. 92-220Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partDooley, J.

Plaintiff wife appeals from a decision of the Windsor Family Court granting plaintiff a divorce and construing a postnuptial agreement to deny her claim of interest on a loan she had made to defendant husband. As this appeal stands, all five justices join in Part I of this opinion and agree that the family court’s ruling construing the post-nuptial agreement must be reversed. We disagree, however, on how the case should proceed. Four members of the Court are evenly divided on the question of which court has jurisdiction over further proceedings occasioned by our reversal, while the Chief…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Heacock v. HeacockMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  2. Kagen v. KagenNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. In re M.C.P.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  4. Kleila v. KleilaNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Bassler v. BasslerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API