Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Deschner

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 20, 1933PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The case was submitted on briefs, and we have only that for the appellants.

Appellants were partners in the bakery business, and the plaintiffs’ case was that the infant plaintiff sustained injury by a nail which through negligence of defendants had gotten into a roll sold by defendants to Mrs. Wilson and eaten by the son Gilbert; that the nail became embedded in one of Gilbert’s tonsils and that after it was extracted an operation was required to rectify the damage done. The state of demand laid the damages at $300 for the infant plaintiff, and $200 for his parents per quod.

We take .up first…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Corin v. S. S. Kresge Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1932

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mullen v. RobertsTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Clayton v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Cassini v. Curtis Candy Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
  4. Navarro v. MartinUnited States District Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API