Legal Opinion
Berryhill v. Healey
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 5, 1903No. Nos. 13,383—(34)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the municipal court of Minneapolis, Holt, J.
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
Action in unlawful detainer and for restitution, commenced in the municipal court of Minneapolis. Complaint was filed April 8, 1902, at which time a summons was issued, returnable April 15. The summons was served on the date of its issuance by leaving a duly attested copy thereof with a suitable person at defendant’s usual place of ¿bode, as provided by C. S. 1894, § 6113. Upon the return day, April 15, defendant appeared specially and moved to dismiss the action, upon the ground that no personal service of the summons was ever made on him, and upon the ground that it did not appear by the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Raymond v. BellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1846
- Carnes v. CrandallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1856
- Galligher v. ConnellNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bartleson v. MunsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Keller v. HenvitSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Buff v. SchaferSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Sodini v. GaberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907