Legal Opinion

Galligher v. Connell

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1888PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the district court of Douglas county. Heard below before Hopewell, J. Goodenow v. IAehfield, 59 Iowa, 266. Kent v. Kent, 2 Mass., 538. Collins v. Jennings, 42 Iowa, 447. Strong v. State, 4 N. E. Reporter, 293. Dale v. Doddridge, 9 Neb., 138.

1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.

The writer heard but a part of the argument in this case, but his associates heard it all, and agreed upon a decision reversing the judgment. The case was thereupon assigned to the writer to prepare an opinion, if, after an *392examination of the record, he coincided with the views of his associates.

The action was brought before a justice of the peace, by Connell against Galligher, to recover the possession of the “east half of lot number five in Griffin & Smith’s addition to the city of Omaha,” upon the ground that, on the 15th day of April, 1885, the plaintiff was in the actual and peaceable…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Estabrook v. HaterothNebraska Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Perkins v. PottsNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Myers v. WillmerothNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Berryhill v. HealeySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  4. Boehler v. KraayNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Lorius v. AbbottNebraska Supreme Court · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API