Lancaster & Love, Inc. v. Mueller Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
YOUNG, Justice.
Appellant’s tort action in trial court was twofold — for malicious prosecution and “meddlesome interference”; defendants (The Mueller Company, an Illinois corporation with Texas office in Harris County, United States Pipe & Foundry Company, a foreign corporation having an office in Dallas County, and Ellis, Smith & Company, a copartnership, also of Dallas County) invoking provisions of Rule 166-A, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure (Summary Judgment). Upon hearing of motions, same were sustained with judgment that plaintiff take nothing, followed by this appeal.
Plaintiff’s trial…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Schroeder v. Texas & Pacific Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1951
- Pate v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
- Goldner-Siegel Corp. v. Kraemer Hosiery Co.New York Supreme Court · 1934
- Koral v. Savory, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1938
- Lancaster & Love, Inc. v. Mueller Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954