Legal Opinion

Elkins v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided July 1, 2009No. CA CR 08-1252PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

D.P. MARSHALL JR., Judge.

h The circuit court revoked Amy Elkins’s suspended sentence because she failed to pay court-ordered fees, costs, and restitution — conditions of her suspension. El-kins’s counsel on appeal has moved to withdraw and filed a no-merit brief pursuant to Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-3(k)(l) and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). While the brief correctly points out that the circuit court made no adverse rulings apart from the ultimate revocation decision, it simply concludes — without explaining why — that no meritorious ground for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Brady v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Samuel Golden v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2025
  2. Burris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2014
  3. Goodman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API