Legal Opinion · Dissent

Emrich v. McNeil

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 30, 1942No. 7864Published

1DissentEdgerton, Associate Justice

This is not a suit to compel support of a child. It is not even a suit to recover money expended for a child’s support. It is a suit by a mother to recover, for her own use, money which the father had agreed to pay her periodically “for the support” of the child. Though the parties called their agreement a stipulation, and filed it among the papers in a divorce suit, the divorce court did not act upon it. It was not a court order. When the present suit was brought, the purpose which the claimed payments had originally been intended to serve could no longer be accomplished, since the periods…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Breiterman v. BreitermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  2. Caffrey v. CaffreyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1925
  3. O'Brien v. O'BrienAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  4. Woods v. BardNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  5. Demonet v. BurkartCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API