Legal Opinion

Mangan v. Des Moines City Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 12, 1925PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Graff, J.

The trial court, upon the conclusion of plaintiff’s testimony, directed a verdict for the defendant. The ruling is the provocation for this appeal. Two questions arise: (1) Did the evidence of plaintiff, offered in support of the pleaded negligence, present a jury question? (2) Was the plaintiff guilty of "contributory negligence as a matter of law?

The instant case is one of novel impression in this state, although many decisions from other jurisdictions are presented for our consideration in briefs and arguments. The difficulty lies in the differentiation of the cited decisions on the fact…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  2. Kelly v. Chicago City Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Dusold v. Chicago Great Western Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  4. Randle v. Birmingham Railway Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  5. Hayden v. Fair Haven & Westville RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Brandenburg v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Householder v. Town of ClaytonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  3. Rue v. WendlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  4. State Ex Rel. Elliott's Department Store Co. v. HaidSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  5. Evans v. Capital Transit Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1944

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API