Legal Opinion

United States v. Charles L. Golightly

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 17, 1987No. 86-1793PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); Tenth Cir.R. 34.1.8(c) and 27.-1.2. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

The defendant, an inmate at the Federal Correctional Institute at Fort Worth, Texas, appeals from the order of the district court entered May 12, 1986, denying motions challenging his sentencing under Fed. R.Crim.P. 35 and 32(c)(3)(D). 1

The defendant alleged in his Rule 35 motion…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Guy Robin EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. Arnold I. Kramer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. Ervin Earl RutterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. Larry PetermanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  3. United States v. Ken GattasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  4. United States v. Timothy Paul StrayerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  5. United States v. Bobby Gene RantzCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API