Legal Opinion

Arnold I. Kramer v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided August 7, 1986No. 85-2803PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLAUM, Circuit Judge.

We write again to provide guidance to the district courts in their application of Fed.R.Crim.P. 32(c)(3)(D) and to amplify our opinion in Kramer v. United States, 788 F.2d 1229 (7th Cir.1986) (Kramer II) to which the defendant has filed an “Emergency Motion For Compliance With Order of This Court.” We remanded to the district court for compliance with Rule 32(c)(3)(D). The district court held a hearing and determined that the disputed statement in the presentence report was “accurate.” We cannot adopt the procedure followed by the trial court but find that the district…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Andrew EschweilerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  2. United States v. Thomas MittelsteadtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  3. Arnold I. Kramer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Richard Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  2. United States v. Zuleta-AlvarezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. Daniel T. SlaughterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. Juan Montoya, Augustine Gomez, and Augustine RamirezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  5. United States v. RosaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API