Legal Opinion

Moore v. Norouzi

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 25, 2002No. 126 & 127, Sept. Term, 2000PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELL, Chief Judge.

In these consolidated appeals, we have been asked to address whether: by notice to a third party claims administrator acting on behalf of a local government, the petitioners, Robert Moore (“Moore”) and Stuart C. Mendelson (“Mendelson”) 1 actually complied with the notice requirement of the Local Government Tort Claims Act (“LGTCA”), Md.Code (1974, 1998 Repl.Vol., 2000 Cum.Supp.) § 5-304 of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article; 2 such notice constitutes substantial compliance with the notice requirement; 3 the court, because good cause was shown and the local…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ashton v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  2. Condon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  3. Heron v. StraderCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  4. Williams v. MaynardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  5. Delaware County v. PowellIndiana Supreme Court · 1979

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Barbre v. PopeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. Rios v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  3. Hansen v. City of LaurelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  4. Faulk v. EwingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  5. State v. SharafeldinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API