Moore v. Norouzi
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
BELL, Chief Judge.
In these consolidated appeals, we have been asked to address whether: by notice to a third party claims administrator acting on behalf of a local government, the petitioners, Robert Moore (“Moore”) and Stuart C. Mendelson (“Mendelson”) 1 actually complied with the notice requirement of the Local Government Tort Claims Act (“LGTCA”), Md.Code (1974, 1998 Repl.Vol., 2000 Cum.Supp.) § 5-304 of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article; 2 such notice constitutes substantial compliance with the notice requirement; 3 the court, because good cause was shown and the local…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ashton v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Condon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Heron v. StraderCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Williams v. MaynardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Delaware County v. PowellIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Barbre v. PopeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Rios v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Hansen v. City of LaurelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- Faulk v. EwingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- State v. SharafeldinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.