Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Fatzer v. Schmitt

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 6, 1953No. 38,810PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Thiele, J.:

This is an original action in the nature of quo warranto commenced by the State on the relation of the Attorney General against D. W. Schmitt, individually, D. W. Schmitt, Manager, “National Pure Trust Service, Rocky Mountain Division,” and National Pure Trust Service, organizational status unknown, to determine if the defendants have been exercising the privilege and franchise of practicing the learned profession of the law, and if so to oust and enjoin them therefrom.

The substance of the pleadings filed is as follows: In the petition it is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Boynton v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  2. Depew v. Wichita Ass'n of Credit MenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  3. Depew v. Wichita Retail Credit Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  4. State ex rel. Boynton v. BuchananSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  5. State ex rel. Beck v. HarveySupreme Court of Kansas · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Martin v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  2. State Ex Rel. Stephan v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  3. In Re Mid-America Living Trust Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  4. Hickock & Smith v. HandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
  5. State Ex Rel. Schneider v. HillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API