Legal Opinion
Cahill v. Nike, Inc.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided March 23, 2020No. 3:18-cv-01477Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON KELLY CAHILL, SARAH JOHNSTON, 3:18-cv-1477-JR LINDSAY ELIZABETH, and HEATHER HENDER, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, ORDER Plaintiffs, v. NIKE, INC., an Oregon Corporation, Defendant. RUSSO, Magistrate Judge: Named plaintiffs Kelly Cahill, Sara Johnston, Lindsay Elizabeth, and Heather Hender bring this putative class and collective action alleging that defendant Nike systematically discriminates against them and other similarly situated women at Nike headquarters regarding salary and promotions. Several…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Dolores DONINGER Et Al., Appellants, v. PACIFIC NORTHWEST BELL, INC., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Bonnie Mantolete v. William G. Bolger, in His Capacity as Postmaster General, United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Martha C. Kamm, a Widow v. California City Development Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Dysthe v. Basic Research, L.L.C.District Court, C.D. California · 2011