Legal Opinion

Martha C. Kamm, a Widow v. California City Development Company, a Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 9, 1975No. 73--3241PublishedCited by 171 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JAMESON, District Judge:

This is an interlocutory appeal, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b), 1 from an order dismissing plaintiffs-appellants’ class action and striking class allegations from their first amended complaint. 2

Parties and Nature of Controversy

The 14 named plaintiffs and the estimated 59,000 members of the class whom they seek to represent are investors in a desert land promotion scheme known as California City. The defendants-appellees are the current promoters of California City, Great Western Cities; three of its affiliated real estate companies, California City…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Reuben J. Katz, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Carte Blanche CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
  2. Gold Strike Stamp Company, a Utah Corporation v. A. Sherman Christensen, District Judge, B. Delos Gardner, Real Parties in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
  3. Berland v. MackDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
  4. Amalgamated Workers Union of the Virgin Islands v. Hess Oil Virgin Islands CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973

3Cited by171 opinions

  1. Tradebay, LLC v. eBay, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2011
  2. Vinole v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. Dolores DONINGER Et Al., Appellants, v. PACIFIC NORTHWEST BELL, INC., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  4. Sykes v. Mel S. Harris & Associates LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
  5. In Re Alford Chevrolet-GeoTexas Supreme Court · 1999

166 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API