Martha C. Kamm, a Widow v. California City Development Company, a Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JAMESON, District Judge:
This is an interlocutory appeal, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b), 1 from an order dismissing plaintiffs-appellants’ class action and striking class allegations from their first amended complaint. 2
Parties and Nature of Controversy
The 14 named plaintiffs and the estimated 59,000 members of the class whom they seek to represent are investors in a desert land promotion scheme known as California City. The defendants-appellees are the current promoters of California City, Great Western Cities; three of its affiliated real estate companies, California City…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Reuben J. Katz, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Carte Blanche CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- Gold Strike Stamp Company, a Utah Corporation v. A. Sherman Christensen, District Judge, B. Delos Gardner, Real Parties in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
- Berland v. MackDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- Amalgamated Workers Union of the Virgin Islands v. Hess Oil Virgin Islands CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
3Cited by171 opinions
- Tradebay, LLC v. eBay, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2011
- Vinole v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Dolores DONINGER Et Al., Appellants, v. PACIFIC NORTHWEST BELL, INC., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Sykes v. Mel S. Harris & Associates LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- In Re Alford Chevrolet-GeoTexas Supreme Court · 1999
166 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.