Legal Opinion

Christopher L. Martin v. Santander Bank

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided June 9, 2026No. 2:26-cv-00911Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION Christopher L. Martin, ) C/A No. 2:26-cv-00911-RMG-WSB ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ) Santander Bank, ) ) Defendant. ) ) Plaintiff, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, brings this civil action against Santander Bank (“Defendant” or “Santander”). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and Local Civil Rule 73.02(B), D.S.C., the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge is authorized to review the pleadings for relief and submit findings and recommendations to the District Court. For the reasons below,…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API