Charlie Hinduja, Varsha D. Hinduja v. Arco Products Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judge:
Charlie Hinduja and Varsha Hinduja appeal the district court’s order dismissing their complaint against ARCO Products Company and others. 1 The district court determined that a stipulation, which incorporated the terms of a settlement between the Hindujas and ARCO, had itself been incorporated into and made an order of the bankruptcy court. The district court, therefore, declared that it could not grant relief because “bankruptcy court orders can only be interpreted for meaning, or for a violation of the order, by the court that issued the order.” We reverse.
BACKGROUND
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hough v. HoughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- MSR Exploration, Ltd. v. Meridian Oil, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Lubrizol Corp. v. Exxon Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Sanders v. City of Brady, TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Westinghouse Electric Corporation v. Newman & Holtzinger, P.C. Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge Chase, Rotchford, Drukker & Bogust, Law CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Odd-Bjorn Huse v. Huse-Sporsem, A.S. (In Re Birting Fisheries, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Satten v. WebbCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- In Re: Shelly Elias, Debtor. Shelly Elias v. U.S. Trustee, Las Vegas, and Lisowski Law Firm, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- In Re: Shelly Elias, Debtor. Shelly Elias v. U.S. Trustee, Las Vegas, and Lisowski Law Firm, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Kake Tribal CorporationUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Alaska · 2023