In re S. R. M.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Phipps, Judge.
The mother of S. R. M. appeals the termination of her parental rights to her child, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence and contending that proceeding with the termination hearing in her absence violated her due process and equal protection rights. For reasons that follow, we affirm.
Termination of parental rights under OCGA § 15-11-94 requires the juvenile court to undertake a two-step process. First, the court must determine whether there is clear and convincing evidence of parental misconduct or inability as provided in OCGA § 15-11-94 (b). Under that Code section,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In the Interest of V. M. T.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Etkind v. SuarezSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
- In the Interest of F. C.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- In the Interest of J. K.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- Stills v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In the Interest of M. T. F.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- In the Interest of A. D. M.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- In the Interest of Z. P.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- In Re AdmCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- In Re ZpCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012