Legal Opinion

Clark v. Fraley

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1833PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from the Tippecanoe Circuit .Court.' The verdict ancj juc¡gment,.in this case, were in favour of Fraley, the plaintiff below.

1Opinion of the CourtStevens, J.

Fraley declared against Clark in an action of replevin, for unjustly and unlawfully taking and detaining divers goods and chattels, of him the said Fraley, of great value, &c.

Clark avowed the taking'and detaining the goods and chattels as a distress for rent, &c., because he says, that on the 15th day of November, 1830, he the said Clark, b.y a certain article of agreement under the hands and seals of him and the said Fraley, demised to said Fraley part of his, said Ciar Ids land, being the field south of the house of said Clark, containing 51 acres, and the corn-field west of the house of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Elliott v. FowlerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1822
  2. Guthrie v. WickliffCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1813

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State ex. rel. Wolfe v. KirkeSupreme Court of Florida · 1868
  2. Briscoe v. McElweenMississippi Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Bowser v. ScottIndiana Supreme Court · 1846
  4. Purcell v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1844

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API