Darby v. Parrish

(After stating the foregoing facts.) Counsel for the

defendant contends that the plaintiff gave to Babson such external indicia of right to dispose of the property that the sale to the defendant, an innocent purchaser, divested the plaintiff’s title. Civil Code (1910), § 4119. We can not agree with this contention. "There being no market overt in Georgia, but the doctrine of caveat emptor being of force, a purchaser of personal property from one

*495who is not the true owner acquires no title against the true owner by reason of the bona fides of his purchase, when he purchases from one who is an…