Stephens v. Irvin
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON REHEARING
BAILEY, Judge
We grant Appellants-Defendants Kimberly Stephens’s (“Stephens”) and The Cincinnati Insurance Companies’s (“CIC”) joint petition for rehearing, for the limited purpose of addressing their contention that, regardless of whether Appellees-Plaintiffs’ motions were deemed motions to correct error or motions to reconsider, the same procedural outcome ensues; namely, that Plaintiffs nonetheless are prohibited from amending their complaint to add Stephens as a defendant in the underlying causes.
Stephens and CIC premise their Petition for Rehearing upon the contention…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Biggs v. MarshIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Wisconics Engineering, Inc. v. FisherIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Hubbard v. HubbardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
- DeHart v. AndersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Waldron v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Johnson v. Estate of BrazillIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- The Branham Corporation v. Newland Resources, LLC and John E. BatorIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
- Hoesman v. ShefflerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- P.R. Mallory & Co. v. American Casualty Co. of Reading, PAIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- Techna-Fit, Inc. and Stuart Trotter v. Fluid Transfer Products, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.