Legal Opinion

Attorney General v. Commissioner of Railroads

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1898PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Mandamus by Fred A. Maynard, Attorney General, to compel Sybrant Wesselius, Commissioner of Railroads, to make an order for a separation of grades at the intersections of certain railways with certain streets in the city of Detroit.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

The petition shows that in January, 1898, the attention of respondent was called by petition by the city of Detroit to the dangerous character of the crossings at the intersections of the tracks of the Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Company, the Grand Trunk Railway Company, and the Michigan Central Railroad Company, with Michigan, Woodward, Gratiot, and Grand River avenues in the city of Detroit. In February following, the respondent made an investigation, and determined that there was a necessity for a separation of grades at the intersection of the streets and railroads men*478tioned,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. District of Columbia v. HuttonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Shannon v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Moore v. Township of KenockeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Crowell v. JaquaIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Fort-street Union Depot Co. v. State Railroad Crossing BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. MarxhausenMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  2. McDowell v. Warden of Michigan ReformatoryMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Farley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1921
  4. Town of Sugar v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1914
  5. Couvelis v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API