Legal Opinion

Larkin v. McAllister

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 17, 1995PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this proceeding to challenge the denial of his application for an area variance by respondent Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Clarendon (Board). Supreme Court properly dismissed the petition. The Board examined each of the factors it is required to consider under Town Law § 267-b (3) (b) and its determination "rests comfortably on a rational basis and substantial evidence” (Matter of Doyle v Amster, 79 NY2d 592, 596; see, Matter of *1076O’Keefe v Donovan, 199 AD2d 681, 682). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Doyle v. AmsterNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. O'Keefe v. DonovanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Plucknette v. Zoning BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API