Legal Opinion

Brennan v. State

Ohio Circuit Courts

Decided July 1, 1900Published

Heard on Error.

1Opinion of the CourtSwing, J.

The plaintiff in error, Henry Brennan, was tried and convicted on an indictment charging him with larceny. The proof tends to show that he was also guilty of robbery or picking pockets. It is claimed that a conviction can not be-had for larceny when the proof also tends to show that robbery was committed. 2 Bishop’s New Criminal Law, sec. Il5t>, defines robbery as follows:

“Robbery is larceny committed by violence from the person of one put in fear.”

And at section 1159, says:

“The indiement for robbery charges larceny together with the aggravating matter which makes it in the particular…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. M'GowanNew York Supreme Court · 1837
  2. Hickey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  3. State v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1865
  4. Fanning v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1883

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API