Legal Opinion

Fanning v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1883PublishedCited by 5 opinions

FROM DAVIDSON. Appeal in error from the Criminal Court of Davidson county. ' Matt. W. Allen, J.

1Opinion of the CourtDeaderick, C. J.

The defendant was convicted of grand larceny upon an indictment containing two counts, one for larceny from the person, the other for obtaining money under false pretenses.

Motions in arrest of judgment and for a new trial having been overruled, he has appealed to this court.

On .a former day of this term, .we held that the ,two, offepses charged in this indictment, and that of *652which defendant was convicted, being of equal grade, the indictment could not be sustained under section 5121 of the Code, and the case of Tucker v. The State, 3 Heis., 484, construing said section, was cited in support…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. English v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Throneberry v. Resolute InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Brennan v. StateOhio Circuit Courts · 1900
  4. English v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
  5. English v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API