Legal Opinion

Curby v. Mastenbrook

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 1940No. Docket No. 25, Calendar No. 41,115Published

1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, C. J.

After obtaining a judgment against the principal defendants (see Curby v. Mastenbrook, 288 Mich. 676), plaintiff secured a writ of garnishment against garnishee defendant, Auto Owners Insurance Company. The latter filed a disclosure denying liability. . Plaintiff then filed special interrogatories to which the garnishee made answer, and demanded trial of the statutory issue. Subsequently, plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment. This was met by objections to the entry of summary judgment and by a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s application.

The objections were that the garnishment matter…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Joy v. Two-Bit CorporationMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Curby v. MastenbrookMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Hoffman v. Professional UnderwritersMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API