Legal Opinion
Hughes Salaried Retirees Action Committee Peter Formo Richard E. Miller Norman C. Rigby v. Administrator of the Hughes Non-Bargaining Retirement Plan
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 13, 1995No. 93-55384PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
39 F.3d 1002
63 USLW 2317, 18 Employee Benefits Cas. 2497,
Pens. Plan Guide P 23903P
HUGHES SALARIED RETIREES ACTION COMMITTEE; Peter Formo;
Richard E. Miller; Norman C. Rigby, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
ADMINISTRATOR OF the HUGHES NON-BARGAINING RETIREMENT PLAN,
Defendant-Appellee.
No. 93-55384.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Nov. 4, 1993.
Decided Nov. 7, 1994.
As Modified Feb. 13, 1995.
Seth Kupferberg, Sipser, Weinstock, Harper & Dorn, New York City, for plaintiffs-appellants.
Robert F. Walker, Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker, Santa Monica, CA, for defendant-appellee.
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States Department of Defense v. Federal Labor Relations AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Love v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Hummell v. S. E. Rykoff & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hughes Salaried Retirees Action Committee Peter Formo Richard E. Miller Norman C. Rigby v. Administrator of the Hughes Non-Bargaining Retirement PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995