Legal Opinion

Wilson v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 16, 2000No. Claim No. 93508PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The Court of Claims properly dismissed this claim arising from a collision between claimant’s vehicle and a snowplow owned by defendant and operated by defendant’s employee. The court properly determined that the snowplow, plowing snow on a highway at the time of the accident, was a “vehicle * * * [or] other equipment * * * actually engaged in work on a highway” within the meaning of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1103 (b) (see, McDonald v State of New York, 176 Misc 2d 130, 139; see also, Riley v *855County of Broome, 263 AD2d 267). “According…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Szczerbiak v. PilatNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. McDonald v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1998
  3. Morrisseau v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. Riley v. County of BroomeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ring v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. Gawelko v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 2000
  3. Yousef v. Verizon Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. Haust v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2013
  5. Johnson v. Hudson River Construction Co.New York Supreme Court · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API