Wilson v. State
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The Court of Claims properly dismissed this claim arising from a collision between claimant’s vehicle and a snowplow owned by defendant and operated by defendant’s employee. The court properly determined that the snowplow, plowing snow on a highway at the time of the accident, was a “vehicle * * * [or] other equipment * * * actually engaged in work on a highway” within the meaning of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1103 (b) (see, McDonald v State of New York, 176 Misc 2d 130, 139; see also, Riley v *855County of Broome, 263 AD2d 267). “According…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Szczerbiak v. PilatNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- McDonald v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1998
- Morrisseau v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Riley v. County of BroomeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ring v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Gawelko v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 2000
- Yousef v. Verizon Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Haust v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2013
- Johnson v. Hudson River Construction Co.New York Supreme Court · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.