Corey v. Hooker
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal by plaintiffs from Bond, J., at September Term, 1915, of Pitt. Civil action upon exceptions to report of referee. Tbe court overruled all plaintiffs’ exceptions and sustained defendants’ exceptions, and made findings of fact and law and rendered judgment accordingly. Tbe plaintiffs appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBeowN, J.
In tbis action plaintiffs seek to perpetually restrain tbe defendants from foreclosing certain mortgages under powers of sale therein contained, executed to Z. Y. Hooker and E. 0. Harding and assigned by them to S. T. Hooker. An injunction to tbe bearing was granted, a reference bad, and tbe case is now presented upon tbe facts and conclusions of law embodied in tbe final decree.
Tbe admitted facts are tbat S. T. Hooker loaned to plaintiffs $12,000 in actual cask and received from plaintiffs tbeir notes and mortgages in amount in excess of tbat sum made to Z. Y. Hooker and E. O. Harding, wbicb…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Simonton v. . LanierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
- Owens v. WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Lindsay v. United States Savings & Loan Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1899
- Churchill v. . TurnageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- Ballinger v. . EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1847
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Waters v. GarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Miller v. . DunnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Wilson v. Union Trust Co. of MarylandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Adams v. Angier Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Smith v. . BryantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.