Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Ford Motor Company

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 1, 1964No. 10024Published

1Opinion of the Court

16 Utah 2d 30 (1964)

395 P.2d 62

HARVEY THOMPSON, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT,

v.

FORD MOTOR COMPANY, DEFENDANT AND RESPONDENT.

No. 10024.

Supreme Court of Utah.

September 1, 1964.

Barton & Klemm, Salt Lake City, for appellant.

Christensen & Jensen, Salt Lake City, for respondent.

CROCKETT, Justice.

Plaintiff sues for injuries suffered when the parking brake on a Salt Lake City garbage truck he was in charge of suddenly gave way so he was unable to get back into and control it. He alleges that the brake mechanism was defective. On the basis of the depositions of the plaintiff and his co-worker Jimmy Jensen,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Alarid v. VanierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Samms v. EcclesUtah Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Martin v. StevensUtah Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Thompson v. Ford Motor CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Morris v. Farnsworth MotelUtah Supreme Court · 1953

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API