Goal Properties, Inc. v. Prestridge
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
AMY, Judge.
11The parties to this lawsuit own adjoining parcels of real property. A dispute arose as to the ownership of portions of the property and this action followed. At the hearing, the trial court found that the defendants’ reconventional demand was a possessory action and heard the matter as a possessory action. Thereafter, the trial court granted the defendants’ possessory action to the extent of their claimed and maintained boundaries as evidenced at the hearing. The plaintiff appeals. For the following reasons, we dismiss the appeal and remand to the trial court for further…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- C. C. Elmer Tank Boiler Co. v. Art Cleaner & DyersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1928
- Borden-Aicklen Auto Supply Co. v. Folse Service StationLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
- Hurst v. RicardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1990
- Copellar v. YountLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
- Creighton, Richards & Higdon, L.L.C. v. Richards Clearview, L.L.C.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hooper v. Hero Lands Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- Phipps v. SchuppLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
- Morgan v. PardueLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- Crooks v. Department Of Natural ResourcesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
- Keenan v. KeenanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.