Legal Opinion
Carnes v. Dexcom Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided December 13, 2024No. 3:24-cv-01809Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 CHARLENE ALONZO, individually and Case No.: 24-cv-1485-RSH-VET on behalf of all others similarly situated, 24-cv-1804-RSH-VET 9 24-cv-1809-RSH-VET Plaintiff, 10 v. ORDER ON MOTIONS TO APPOINT 11 LEAD COUNSEL AND LEAD DEXCOM INC., et al., 12 PLAINTIFF AND FOR Defendants. CONSOLIDATION OF ACTIONS 13 14 [ECF Nos. 8, 9, 10, 11] 15 OAKLAND COUNTY EMPLOYEES’ 16 RETIREMENT SYSTEMS, et al., individually and on behalf of all others 17 similarly situated, 18 Plaintiffs, 19 v. 20 DEXCOM INC., et al., 21 Defendants. 22 MATTHEW…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- David Hanon v. Dataproducts Corporation Jack C. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Pierce v. County of OrangeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Caitlin Ahearn v. Hyundai Motor AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- In Re Olsten Corp. Securities Litig.District Court, E.D. New York · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.