Legal Opinion

Board of Trustees of Town 13 South, Range 3 West v. Misenheimer

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1878PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Union county; the Hon. Monroe C. Crawford, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

The bill of exceptions does not purport to contain all the evidence, and it is, therefore, impossible for us to say that the evidence below did not authorize the verdict returned by the jury. Ottawa Gaslight and Coke Company v. Graham, 35 Ill. 346; Buckland v. Goddard, 36 id. 206; Ballance v. Leonard, 37 id. 44; Esty v. Grant, 55 id. 341; Goodrich v. Minonk, 62 id. 121; Wilson v. McDowell, 65 id. 522; Culliner v. Nash, 76 id. 515; Henry v. Halloway, 78 id. 356.

It does not appear that any exception was taken at the time to the giving or refusing of instructions, nor to the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ottawa Gas-Light & Coke Co. v. GrahamIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Grimes v. ButtsIllinois Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sutton v. Board of EducationAppellate Court of Illinois · 1930
  2. Fuller v. BatesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1880
  3. National Builders Bank of Chicago v. SimonsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1940
  4. Sheean v. BeilAppellate Court of Illinois · 1939
  5. Union Insurance v. CrosbyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1897

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API