Legal Opinion

In Re Scahill

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 2002No. 49S00-0103-DI-172PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DISCIPLINARY ACTION

2Per curiam

James N. Seahill's client cashed an $80,500 IRA while the client's divorce was pending and claimed he lost the proceeds in a restaurant. Seahill, who practices in Indianapolis, did not inform the dissolution court or the adverse party of the loss of the IRA even after the trial court awarded a portion of the non-existent IRA to the client's wife. We conclude that the respondent engaged in professional misconduct and reprimand him for his actions.

This attorney disciplinary case is now before us for final determination upon the hearing officer's findings of fact and…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rice v. StrunkIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Selke v. SelkeIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  3. In Re ThonertIndiana Supreme Court · 2000

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. John Doe 1 v. Indiana Department of Child ServicesIndiana Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Carlson v. WarrenIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Richard Dillon CrottySupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  4. In Re PageIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  5. August Wohlt v. Christi WohltIndiana Supreme Court · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API