Amended August 21, 2014 Ned Chiodo v. The Section 43.24 Panel Consisting of: Secretary of State Matthew Schultz, Auditor of State Mary Mosiman and Attorney General Thomas Miller
Supreme Court of Iowa
1ConcurrenceMansfield, J.
(specially concurring).
While I agree that Anthony Bisignano should not be disqualified from running for state senate, I cannot join the plurality opinion. I agree with the Panel, the district court, and Iowa’s elected representatives that felonies and only felonies are “infamous crimes” under article II, section 5 of the Iowa Constitution.
As the dissent correctly points out, the plurality throws out nearly a hundred years of this court’s precedents. Yet what is its replacement? That is hard to tell. *858Lacking a sound conceptual floor for its opinion, or a clear test, I think the plurality has…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Richardson v. RamirezSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- State of Iowa v. Dontay Dakwon SanfordSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
- Madison v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Madison v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.