Legal Opinion

Philadelphia v. Peter E. Costello & Sons, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 13, 1944No. Appeal, 169Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

Since the 'Consolidation Act of February 2, 1854, P. L. 21, the City of Philadelphia by ordinance has paved many of its streets at the cost of owners of land fronting on the improvement. Now for the first time in forty-nine years it is contended that the Consolidation Act, insofar as it applies to procedure by ordinance in paving city streets (where as here the property owners have not petitioned for the improvement) was supplanted by the Act of May 22, 1895, P. L. 105. That act as amended April 25,1903, P. L. 301, 53 PS 651, provides that a copy of the ordinance, for the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In re Greenfield AvenueSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  2. Mt. Pleasant Bor. v. Balt. & O. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  3. Paving, etc., of Wyoming StreetSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  4. City ex rel. O'Rourke v. HaysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
  5. City of Philadelphia v. RichardsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API