Legal Opinion

Bell v. Arel

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 9, 1983No. 81-457PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBois, J.

The plaintiffs appeal from a Superior Court (Dunn, J.) decision approving a Master’s (Charles T. Gallagher, Esq.) ruling that the defendants had acted lawfully in refusing to place the plaintiffs’ proposed ordinance before the voters of Nashua. We affirm.

In September 1981, the plaintiffs, taxpayers of Nashua, submitted an initiative petition to the Nashua Board of Aldermen (the board), as permitted by the city charter. The petition, entitled “A Petition For Tax Relief For Nashua Citizens,” satisfied all the procedural requirements for submission under the city charter and contained the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stablex Corp. v. Town of HooksettSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  2. State v. ROGER M.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  3. State v. DriscollSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  4. Town of Salisbury v. New England Power Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  5. Harriman v. City of LebanonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Randi Beth Berniger v. Meadow Green-Wildcat Corp., D/B/A Wildcat MountainCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  2. McAlpine v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Board of Supervisors of Elections v. SmallwoodCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  4. City of Portsmouth v. Association of Portsmouth TeachersSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  5. Board of Supervisors of Elections v. SmallwoodCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API