Legal Opinion
State v. Williams
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided June 17, 1993No. 34A02-9209-CR-00443PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STATON, Judge.
The State of Indiana brings this interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s order granting Charles Williams’ (“Williams”) and Lamont Grace’s (“Grace”) motions to suppress illegally seized evidence. The State raises the sole issue of whether the trial court erred in granting the motions to suppress..
We affirm.
On March 27, 1992, Karen Giles (“Giles”) telephoned Captain Walter Adams (“Adams”) of the Kokomo Police Department and informed him that Williams and Grace had arrived at the residence where Giles was staying as a guest, and that they had cocaine in their possession. Giles,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. Daniel Patrick RosselliCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- Sayre v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- State v. TuckerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hardister v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. StraubIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Hawkins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. JoeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
- Chicago Southshore & South Bend Railroad v. Itel Rail Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.