Legal Opinion

Frost v. Schroeder & Co., Inc.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided May 19, 1994No. 93CA0520PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge HUME.

Plaintiffs Floyd E. and Cheryl A. Frost appeal the trial court’s judgment insofar as it reduced their jury award by the amount of certain insurance proceeds that the court determined to be from a non-collateral source and refused to award them costs. Plaintiffs Aetna Casualty and Surety Company (Aetna) and The Standard Fire Insurance Company (Standard) appeal the trial court’s dismissal of their claim for contribution. Defendants, Schroeder & Co., Dale Arthur, and Steven Schroeder, cross-appeal the trial court’s order which restricted the jury’s consideration of certain…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Van Waters & Rogers, Inc. v. KeelanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  2. Committee for Better Health Care for All Colorado Citizens v. MeyerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  3. Boettcher & Co., Inc. v. MunsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  4. Wickland v. SnyderColorado Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. National Canada Corp. v. DikeouColorado Court of Appeals · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tucker v. Volunteers of America Colorado BranchColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Trione v. Mike Wallen Standard, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Phillips v. WatkinsColorado Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API