Legal Opinion

Pugh v. Oklahoma Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided January 22, 1958No. Civ. A. 7116PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WRIGHT, District Judge.

This case involves another attempt,, via state statute, further to whittle down the once revered doctrine of Pennoyer v. Neff, 95 U.S. 714, 24 L.Ed. 565. Like most similar attempts, it succeeds because the considerations which gave rise to the personal jurisdiction doctrine of Pennoyer v. Neff are no longer valid. Notice, opportunity adequately to defend, and assurance of fair trial no longer depend on physical presence within the jurisdiction. Consequently, the requirement of physical presence has been replaced by such considerations as minimal contacts giving the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Bahn v. Chicago Motor Club InsuranceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  2. Krueger v. Rheem Manufacturing CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  3. In Re AugustCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
  4. Humble Oil & Refining Company v. M/V John E. CoonDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1962
  5. Marie Minichiello, as of the Estate of Thomas Minichiello, and Marie Minichiello v. Oliver Rosenberg, Elwin W. Stevens, on Behalf of His Son, Dennis J. Stevens, an Infant Overfourteen Years of Age, and Elwin W. Stevens, Individually v. Stephen H. Tyng, Sr. And Stephen H. Tyng, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API