Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Sapp

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 6, 1985PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarvey, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 10, 1984, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant worked for Dry Dock Savings Bank in New York City from mid-February until the latter part of March 1982. On December 23, 1982, she filled out an employment application seeking a position at Amalgamated Bank of New York. On the application, she listed a number of temporary positions she held over the past five or six years but omitted the fact that she had worked for Dry Dock.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re the Claim of PunterNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. In re McHughAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  3. Matter of Rosedietcher (Levine)New York Court of Appeals · 1974

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of StickaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. In re the Claim of MerardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. In re the Claim of YuhasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API