Legouffe v. Prestige Homes, Inc.

BERMAN, Judge.

Arguing that remand instructions from our Supreme Court were not followed, petitioner, Guy Y. Legouffe (claimant), seeks review of the Industrial Commission’s refusal to reopen this workmen’s compensation proceeding. We set aside the order.

The facts surrounding the claim for benefits here at issue are adequately set forth in our previous opinion, Legouffe v. Prestige Homes, Inc., 634 P.2d 1010 (Colo.App.1981), and in our Supreme Court’s previous opinion, Prestige Homes, Inc. v. Legouffe, 658 P.2d 850 (Colo.1983), and we need not reiterate them here. In remanding this case to the…