Legal Opinion

Walther v. Mutual Life Insurance

California Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1884No. 9,302PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Ippeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the county of Sacramento, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts appear in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMyrick, J.

This is an action on a policy of insurance on the life of plaintiff’s husband. The policy contained the statement that “ the company does not insure against self-destruction in any form”; it also required proofs of death to be furnished, including statements from attending physicians, a householder, and the undertaker. *

On the trial of this case, the plaintiff, after proving the fact of death, offered in evidence, for the sole purpose of showing compliance with the requirement of the policy, preliminary proof of the death of deceased which had been furnished to the company by the plaintiff,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Insurance Co. v. NewtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1875

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Mar Shee v. Maryland Assurance Corp.California Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Aetna Life Insurance v. MilwardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
  3. Thornell v. Missouri State Life Ins.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  4. Supreme Tent Knights of Maccabees of the World v. StenslandIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Cox v. Royal TribeOregon Supreme Court · 1903

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API