Legal Opinion

State v. Mendenhall

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 20, 1981No. J79-1917, J79-1918, J79-1919, J79-1920, J79-1921; CA 19187PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUTTLER, P. J,

Defendant was convicted of Theft in the First Degree and Conspiracy to Commit Theft in the First Degree under five indictments, the convictions on all of which were merged for sentencing. Under his first assignment of error, defendant seeks reversal of the judgments of conviction, and on his second assignment of error, he seeks a new trial.

Defendant’s first assignment of error is:

"Upon first assignment of error is that the evidence does not support the verdict and show beyond a reasonable doubt the guilt of appellant.”

We cannot tell from that whether defendant moved for a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  2. State v. WalkerOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  3. H.N.M. Enterprises, Inc. v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. Green v. C & H Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bollam v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  2. City of Portland v. PaulsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  3. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  4. State v. KralCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  5. Jack Jacobs, Inc. v. Allied Systems Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API