In re the Construction of the Will of Bush
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtKimball, J.
We agree with the result reached by the Surrogate that any securities or investments distributed in kind, as authorized by the will, should be received and taken at the appraised values as of the date of death of the testatrix. We think that the intention of the testatrix is manifest from the will itself and that it is unnecessary to draw inferences as to her intention from her experience in the settling of her mother’s estate. Since section 268 of the Surrogate’s Court Act has no application where distribution in kind is made pursuant to the provisions of the will (Matter of Kent, 173 App.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re the Accounting of CarmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1946
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of KentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- In re the Estate of StutzerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
- In re the Estate of FarleyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1941
3Cited by11 opinions
- In re the Estate of GutwirthNew York Surrogate's Court · 1967
- In re the Estate of McKeeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1986
- In re the Estate of MaglinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1975
- Nicolai v. HoffmanOregon Supreme Court · 1962
- In re the Estate of GoutmanovitchNew York Surrogate's Court · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.