Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Kirk & Son, Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1959PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KING, J.,

(Pro Tempore)

This is an action for damages for personal injuries. Plaintiff claims both under the Employers’ Liability Act and under common-law negligence.

After the plaintiff had completed his case, the lower court granted defendant’s motion for nonsuit and plaintiff appealed.

There is just one assignment of error, namely: The court erred in sustaining defendant’s motion for nonsuit.

The plaintiff, Edward D. Fisher, was a 44-year-old truck driver regularly employed as such by Consolidated Freightways. He had been working for the same employer for approximately 10 years prior to the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Rorvik v. North Pac. Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Turnidge v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Warner v. SynnesOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Shelton v. ParisOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Hicklin v. AndersOregon Supreme Court · 1954

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dawson v. Payless for DrugsOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Yanzick v. TawneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  3. Browning v. Terminal Ice & Cold Storage Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Browning v. Terminal Ice & Cold Storage Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Dawson v. Payless for DrugsOregon Supreme Court · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API