Legal Opinion

Russell v. Meyers

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 28, 1924PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Clarke

Affirming in part and reversing in part.

Poster Ray executed and delivered to appellant, S. A. Russell, his promissory note for $3,00(400. By this action Russell sought a personal judgment against Ray Í for the amount due on the note, and to subject to its pay-: ment attached funds held by appellee Meyers as trustee v.under the will of Ray’s mother, Mrs. Lucy Ray McMillen.

Ray answered, admitting his execution and delivery of the note, that it was a just demand against him, and that it was payable out of the funds in Meyers’ hands. /By cross-petition he denied…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bank of Taylorsville v. VandykeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  2. Hackett's Trustee v. HackettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Estes v. EstesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
  2. Young, Etc. v. Bankers' Trust Co.'s ReceiverCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  3. Goodloe's Trustee and Adm'r v. GoodloeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
  4. Keith v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  5. Akers v. Kentucky Title Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API