Merced County Human Services Agency v. Sharon D.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BEST, J.
Statement of the Case
On March 30, 1987, a petition was filed alleging that Christie D. was a dependent child under the provisions of Welfare and Institutions Code1 section 300, subdivisions (a) and (d), specifically alleging: “Said minor is in need of proper and effective parental care or control and has no parent or guardian willing to exercise or capable of exercising such care or control and further, whose home is unfit for her by reason of cruelty, depravity, and physical abuse. On March 27, 1987, the minor stated and demonstrated that she orally copulated her father’s…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- In Re TahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- People v. ShirleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.