Legal Opinion
Stoker v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co.
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided January 16, 2019No. CV-18-00427-TUC-RMPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Honorable Rosemary Márquez, United States District Judge
Pending before the Court is Defendants' Partial Motion to Dismiss. (Doc. 16.) For the following reasons, the Motion is denied.
I. Background
The First Amended Complaint contains the following allegations: at all relevant times, Plaintiff Deena Stoker was covered under a group long-term disability ("LTD") insurance plan issued by Defendant Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company ("Hartford") and governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA"). (Doc. 11, ¶¶ 5, 8.) Plaintiff became disabled in 2009 due to multiple…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Moss v. U.S. Secret ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Aetna Health Inc. v. DavilaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Julie Thurston v. Western Alliance Bank, et al.District Court, D. Arizona · 2026